Quake prediction panel to retain name despite 3/11 disaster setback

An earthquake prediction panel is not going to change its name even after its failure to predict the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, it has been learned.

The Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction (CCEP) on Feb. 17 approved a report filed by a working group within the committee, which stated that the CCEP will aim to improve the methods for earthquake prediction through research while retaining the entity's name.

The working group was set up in 2012 out of regret for having failed to forecast the Great East Japan Earthquake. The working panel had been considering reviewing CCEP's roles but concluded that the entity should retain its current organization and function.

In the wake of the March 11, 2011 quake disaster, many pointed to the difficulty of predicting temblors, leading to a move to review the CCEP's name. However, the panel concluded that the removal of "prediction" from the entity's name could give the false message that CCEP has abandoned its efforts for quake prediction.

Established in 1969, the CCEP provides a forum for government organizations and universities engaged in observation and research on earthquake prediction to exchange information.

コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

TRON:地震の強さ、場所、時刻を正確に予測する技術

АНТИПРЕМИЯ РУНЕТА 2012 номинация: Наука без образования Сомнительные научные достижения. Facebook Civ TRON.ru

自然災害を予知する最も活発な動物たち

This rate change, known as “accelerating moment release” (AMR), has been proposed as a signal that could be used to forecast large earthquakes. If this idea is correct, then it should be possible to estimate the likelihood of an earthquake by searching for accelerating seismicity related to stress accumulation on specific faults

南海トラフ地震の被害額は20年以上で1,466兆円と予測

1974年,偉大舵手毛澤東同志說:«地震不應該由科學家來預測,而應該由人來預測»

Gemma 4 Kaggleハッカソン2026におけるTRONパイロット実験

Japanese earthquake news IT

Компания Yahoo отказалась предоставлять свои сервисы для прогнозирования землетрясений в Японском море.